Skip to main content

The Perversity of Things: Hugo Gernsback on Media, Tinkering, and Scientifiction: The Perversity of Things: Hugo Gernsback on Media, Tinkering, and Scientifiction

The Perversity of Things: Hugo Gernsback on Media, Tinkering, and Scientifiction
The Perversity of Things: Hugo Gernsback on Media, Tinkering, and Scientifiction
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeThe Perversity of Things
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

Show the following:

  • Annotations
  • Resources
Search within:

Adjust appearance:

  • font
    Font style
  • color scheme
  • Margins
table of contents
  1. Front Matter
    1. Cover
    2. Title Page
    3. Copyright Page
    4. Dedication
    5. Chronological Contents
    6. Thematic Contents
    7. How to Use This Book
    8. Acknowledgments
    9. Introduction
      1. “up-to-date technic”: Hugo Gernsback’s Pulp Media Theory
      2. “a perfect Babel of voices”: Communities of Inquiry and Wireless Publics
      3. “’phone and code”: Dynamophone, Radioson, and Other Emerging Media
      4. “certain future instrumentalities”: The Mineral Proficiencies of Tinkering
      5. “we exploit the future”: Scientifiction’s Debut
  2. Part I. Tinkering
    1. A New Interrupter (1905)
    2. The Dynamophone (1908)
    3. The Born and the Mechanical Inventor (1911)
    4. The Radioson Detector (1914)
    5. What to Invent (1916)
    6. The Perversity of Things (1916)
    7. Thomas A. Edison Speaks to You (1919)
    8. Human Progress (1922)
    9. Results of the $500.00 Prize Contest: Who Will Save the Radio Amateur? (1923)
    10. The Isolator (1925)
    11. The Detectorium (1926)
    12. New Radio “Things” Wanted (1927)
  3. Part II. History and Theory of Media
    1. The Aerophone Number (1908)
    2. Why “Radio Amateur News”Is Here (1919)
    3. Science and Invention (1920)
    4. Learn and Work While You Sleep (1921)
    5. The “New” Science and Invention (1923)
    6. Are We Intelligent? (1923)
  4. Part III. Broadcast Regulation
    1. The Wireless Joker (1908)
    2. The Wireless Association of America (1909)
    3. The Roberts Wireless Bill (1910)
    4. The Alexander Wireless Bill (1912)
    5. Wireless and the Amateur: A Retrospect (1913)
    6. Sayville (1915)
    7. War and the Radio Amateur (1917)
    8. Silencing America’s Wireless (1917)
    9. Amateur Radio Restored (1919)
    10. The Future of Radio (1919)
    11. Wired versus Space Radio (1927)
  5. Part IV. Wireless
    1. [Editorials] (1909)
    2. From The Wireless Telephone (1911)
    3. From A Treatise on Wireless Telegraphy (1913)
    4. The Future of Wireless (1916)
    5. From Radio for All (1922)
    6. Radio Broadcasting (1922)
    7. Is Radio at a Standstill? (1926)
    8. Edison and Radio (1926)
    9. Why the Radio Set Builder? (1927)
    10. Radio Enters into a New Phase (1927)
    11. The Short-Wave Era (1928)
  6. Part V. Television
    1. Television and the Telephot (1909)
    2. A Radio-Controlled Television Plane (1924)
    3. After Television—What? (1927)
    4. Television Technique (1931)
  7. Part VI. Sound
    1. Hearing through Your Teeth (1916)
    2. Grand Opera by Wireless (1919)
    3. The Physiophone: Music for the Deaf (1920)
    4. The “Pianorad” (1926)
  8. Part VII. Scientifiction
    1. Signaling to Mars (1909)
    2. Our Cover (1913)
    3. Phoney Patent Offizz: Bookworm’s Nurse (1915)
    4. Imagination versus Facts (1916)
    5. Interplanetarian Wireless (1920)
    6. An American Jules Verne (1920)
    7. 10,000 Years Hence (1922)
    8. Predicting Future Inventions (1923)
    9. The Dark Age of Science (1925)
    10. A New Sort of Magazine (1926)
    11. The Lure of Scientifiction (1926)
    12. Fiction versus Facts (1926)
    13. Editorially Speaking (1926)
    14. Imagination and Reality (1926)
    15. How to Write “Science” Stories (1930)
    16. Science Fiction versus Science Faction (1930)
    17. Wonders of the Machine Age (1931)
    18. Reasonableness in Science Fiction (1932)
  9. Part VIII. Selected Fiction
    1. Ralph 124C 41+, Part 3 (1911)
    2. Baron Münchhausen’s New Scientific Adventures, Part 5: “Münchhausen Departs for the Planet Mars” (1915)
    3. The Magnetic Storm (1918)
    4. The Electric Duel (1927)
    5. The Killing Flash (1929)
  10. Back Matter
    1. Index

140. See George C. Jencks, “Dime Novel Makers,” The Bookman 20 (October 1904): 108–14; E. F. Bleiler, “From the Newark Steam Man to Tom Swift,” Extrapolation 30, no. 2 (1989): 101–16.

141. Ross, Strange Weather, 106

142. E. F. Bleiler, “Dime-Novel SF,” in The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction, ed. John Clute et al. (London: Gollancz, 2014); updated February 10, 2016, http://www.sf-encyclopedia.com/entry/dime-novel_sf.

143. John Rieder, Colonialism and the Emergence of Science Fiction (Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press, 2008), 32–33.

144. Ross, Strange Weather, 111.

145. Cheng, Astounding Wonder, 116.

146. Larbalestier, The Battle of the Sexes in Science Fiction, 10.

147. See ibid., 117–35. Larbalestier provides readings of women SF writers as well, including Claire Winger Harris and Leslie F. Stone, whose story “The Conquest of Gola” in the April 1931 issue of Wonder Stories thematized the “battle of the sexes.”

148. Mary Byers, “In Other Words, It Isn’t What You Say, It’s the Way You Say It,” Astounding Science Fiction (December 1938): 160–61.

149. For more on women in early science fiction, see Jane Donawerth, Frankenstein’s Daughters: Women Writing Science Fiction (Syracuse, N.Y: Syracuse University Press, 1997); Robin Roberts, A New Species: Gender and Science in Science Fiction (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1993); Lisa Yaszek, Galactic Suburbia: Recovering Women’s Science Fiction (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2008); Lisa Yaszek and Patrick B. Sharp, eds., Sisters of Tomorrow: The First Women of Science Fiction (Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press, 2016).

150. A movement calling themselves the Sad Puppies attempted to influence the 2015 Hugo Awards by creating a campaign to nominate more white male writers, whom they felt had been excluded from recent ballots. For a profile of the controversy that resulted and the eventual withdrawal of authors from the ballot who didn’t want to be associated with these views, see Amy Wallace, “Sci-Fi’s Hugo Awards and the Battle for Pop Culture’s Soul,” WIRED, October 2015, http://www.wired.com/2015/10/hugo-awards-controversy/.

Annotate

Next Chapter
A New Interrupter
PreviousNext
Copyright 2016 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org