Skip to main content

The Perversity of Things: Hugo Gernsback on Media, Tinkering, and Scientifiction: Reasonableness in Science Fiction

The Perversity of Things: Hugo Gernsback on Media, Tinkering, and Scientifiction
Reasonableness in Science Fiction
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeThe Perversity of Things
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

Show the following:

  • Annotations
  • Resources
Search within:

Adjust appearance:

  • font
    Font style
  • color scheme
  • Margins
table of contents
  1. Front Matter
    1. Cover
    2. Title Page
    3. Copyright Page
    4. Dedication
    5. Chronological Contents
    6. Thematic Contents
    7. How to Use This Book
    8. Acknowledgments
    9. Introduction
      1. “up-to-date technic”: Hugo Gernsback’s Pulp Media Theory
      2. “a perfect Babel of voices”: Communities of Inquiry and Wireless Publics
      3. “’phone and code”: Dynamophone, Radioson, and Other Emerging Media
      4. “certain future instrumentalities”: The Mineral Proficiencies of Tinkering
      5. “we exploit the future”: Scientifiction’s Debut
  2. Part I. Tinkering
    1. A New Interrupter (1905)
    2. The Dynamophone (1908)
    3. The Born and the Mechanical Inventor (1911)
    4. The Radioson Detector (1914)
    5. What to Invent (1916)
    6. The Perversity of Things (1916)
    7. Thomas A. Edison Speaks to You (1919)
    8. Human Progress (1922)
    9. Results of the $500.00 Prize Contest: Who Will Save the Radio Amateur? (1923)
    10. The Isolator (1925)
    11. The Detectorium (1926)
    12. New Radio “Things” Wanted (1927)
  3. Part II. History and Theory of Media
    1. The Aerophone Number (1908)
    2. Why “Radio Amateur News”Is Here (1919)
    3. Science and Invention (1920)
    4. Learn and Work While You Sleep (1921)
    5. The “New” Science and Invention (1923)
    6. Are We Intelligent? (1923)
  4. Part III. Broadcast Regulation
    1. The Wireless Joker (1908)
    2. The Wireless Association of America (1909)
    3. The Roberts Wireless Bill (1910)
    4. The Alexander Wireless Bill (1912)
    5. Wireless and the Amateur: A Retrospect (1913)
    6. Sayville (1915)
    7. War and the Radio Amateur (1917)
    8. Silencing America’s Wireless (1917)
    9. Amateur Radio Restored (1919)
    10. The Future of Radio (1919)
    11. Wired versus Space Radio (1927)
  5. Part IV. Wireless
    1. [Editorials] (1909)
    2. From The Wireless Telephone (1911)
    3. From A Treatise on Wireless Telegraphy (1913)
    4. The Future of Wireless (1916)
    5. From Radio for All (1922)
    6. Radio Broadcasting (1922)
    7. Is Radio at a Standstill? (1926)
    8. Edison and Radio (1926)
    9. Why the Radio Set Builder? (1927)
    10. Radio Enters into a New Phase (1927)
    11. The Short-Wave Era (1928)
  6. Part V. Television
    1. Television and the Telephot (1909)
    2. A Radio-Controlled Television Plane (1924)
    3. After Television—What? (1927)
    4. Television Technique (1931)
  7. Part VI. Sound
    1. Hearing through Your Teeth (1916)
    2. Grand Opera by Wireless (1919)
    3. The Physiophone: Music for the Deaf (1920)
    4. The “Pianorad” (1926)
  8. Part VII. Scientifiction
    1. Signaling to Mars (1909)
    2. Our Cover (1913)
    3. Phoney Patent Offizz: Bookworm’s Nurse (1915)
    4. Imagination versus Facts (1916)
    5. Interplanetarian Wireless (1920)
    6. An American Jules Verne (1920)
    7. 10,000 Years Hence (1922)
    8. Predicting Future Inventions (1923)
    9. The Dark Age of Science (1925)
    10. A New Sort of Magazine (1926)
    11. The Lure of Scientifiction (1926)
    12. Fiction versus Facts (1926)
    13. Editorially Speaking (1926)
    14. Imagination and Reality (1926)
    15. How to Write “Science” Stories (1930)
    16. Science Fiction versus Science Faction (1930)
    17. Wonders of the Machine Age (1931)
    18. Reasonableness in Science Fiction (1932)
  9. Part VIII. Selected Fiction
    1. Ralph 124C 41+, Part 3 (1911)
    2. Baron Münchhausen’s New Scientific Adventures, Part 5: “Münchhausen Departs for the Planet Mars” (1915)
    3. The Magnetic Storm (1918)
    4. The Electric Duel (1927)
    5. The Killing Flash (1929)
  10. Back Matter
    1. Index

Reasonableness in Science Fiction

Wonder Stories, vol. 4, no. 7, December 1932

When science fiction first came into being, it was taken most seriously by all authors. In practically all instances, authors laid the basis of their stories upon a solid scientific foundation. If an author made a statement as to certain future instrumentalities, he usually found it advisable to adhere closely to the possibilities of science as it was then known.

Many modern science fiction authors have no such scruples. They do not hesitate to throw scientific plausibility overboard, and embark upon a policy of what I might call scientific magic, in other words, science that is neither plausible, nor possible. Indeed, it overlaps the fairy tale, and often goes the fairy tale one better.

This is a deplorable state of affairs, and one that I certainly believe should be avoided by all science fiction authors, if science fiction is to survive.

In the present offering, Mr. John W. Campbell, Jr., has no doubt realized this state of affairs and has proceeded in an earnest way to burlesque some of our rash authors to whom plausibility and possible science mean nothing.[1] He pulls, magician-like, all sorts of impossible rays from his silk hat, much as a magician extracts rabbits. There is no situation that cannot easily be overcome by some sort of a preposterous—(as he terms it)—gimmick. Hurling fifteen million horsepower from one space flyer to another means nothing. If he has left out any colored rays, or any magical rays that could not immediately perform certain miraculous wonders, we are not aware of this shortcoming in his story.

In other words, the author proceeds to burlesque science fiction—not only science fiction, but he burlesques his own abilities, to show us what really can be accomplished when the bounds of reasonableness are overstepped.

Yet, all in all, he has spun a delightful tale which will, nevertheless, entertain you, and keep your interest throughout. We are tempted to rename the story “Ray! Ray!” but thought better of it.

I have gone to this length to preach the sermon in the hope that misguided authors will see the light, and hereafter stick to science as it is known, or as it may reasonably develop in the future.

Note

1. This editorial note introduces John W. Campbell’s short story, “Space Rays.” The ad for the story in the previous month’s issue announces: “‘Space Rays’ is a new and rather intriguing story by that popular author. Mr. Campbell probably had an unusual idea in writing this story. He not only has written a gripping adventure of space, but has at the same time put his finger on one of the weaknesses of science fiction. You will be amazed at the man who can throw a screw driver with the speed of a pistol bullet, and who can whip a dozen men at once. These feats, strange as they seem, are explained by our author scientifically, in a battle of one man against desperate odds.”

Campbell would, of course, soon become famous as the editor of Astounding Science Fiction from 1937–1971, playing a decisive role in the development of the genre throughout the twentieth century. Here, Gernsback takes the opportunity to remind his readers (and potential contributors) of the empirical plausibility and educational aims of scientifiction as he first formulated it. Although Campbell himself would later demand the same sort of empirical rigor from his authors, this is evidently not what he was after in this story of space piracy and a hero from Jupiter with the strength of ten men. Commenting on Gernsback’s tone here, Gary Westfahl writes, “Clearly, Gernsback was imposing his own didactic message on a story with no satiric intent, but no doubt thought this was the gentlest way to inform Campbell and his colleagues that their colorful adventure stories were not the sort of science fiction he admired.” Gary Westfahl, “The Mightiest Machine: The Development of American Science Fiction from the 1920s to the 1960s,” in The Cambridge Companion to American Science Fiction, ed. Gerry Canavan and Eric Carl Link, 17–30 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015).

Inlaid editorial commentary for John W. Campbell’s story “Space Rays” in the December 1932 Wonder Stories.

Annotate

Next Chapter
Index
PreviousNext
Copyright 2016 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org